Wednesday, August 03, 2005

Rebuttal: Wall Street Journal Editoral

Wall Street Journal Editorial Page Rebuttal

As anyone who tracks the media knows, The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page is the heart and soul of the conservative media today. Rush Limbaugh picks up their messages and jokes about them on the radio. Sean Hannity and Bill O'Rielly use their messages as the basis for economic rants on TV. I encourage every Virginian to read the Wall Street Journal Editorial Page, for it is on this page itself that you see the crystal clear essence of the "no taxes" mind at work.

How surprised was I today to see an article entitled Virginia Ham, initially singing the praises of my beloved Governor, Mark Warner.

I was initially astounded at the tone. It was filled with such glowing praise. It had such wonderful insights in to the workings and strengths of the Warner candidacy.

In the first few paragraphs I thought "Wow! These guys love my candidate. This is too good to be true." It was...

As I say, it starts out nice enough:

Who, if anyone, will emerge as the moderate challenge to Hillary?

The candidate who seems to be rising like a comet is the governor of Virginia, Mark Warner. One Democratic political strategist, Jim Jordan, who served as John Kerry's political adviser, has gone so far to say: "If [Gov. Warner] gets in, there is a real possibility that he emerges as the primary alternative to Hillary Clinton, and there is a strong argument to be made that he would be the party's strongest conceivable general election candidate."


As a Warner supporter this was music to my ears. According to the Wall Street Journal, Warner's candidacy is "rising like a comet" and is potentially the "strongest conceivable" in the general election. Be still my heart.
Now let me say this. Mark Warner has been great for Virginia. When he came in to office his predecessor, Governor Gilmore, had gutted the budget by enacting massive tax cuts. He left the localities to fend for themselves and left education, roads, utilities, and families all languishing.

Warner's Administration has been one of the most successful statewide administrations in the history of state politics. Mark Warner and his lieutenant Tim Kaine began managing the massive deficits by streamling government, but went on to enact well crafted initiatives which addressed pressing problems for Virginians including security, economic development, health, volunteerism, schools, government accountability, and health insurance for children. Together, the Warner/Kaine initiatives established a firm footing for the long run health of the commonwealth.

Smart initiatives, streamlined government and balanced budgets were the beginning. By streamlining government, Warner and Kaine were able to fully fund the state's requirements, but in order to fulfill the State's obligations to localities especially schools and in order to reduce the amount of taxation on 75% of Virginians, Warner and Kaine coordinated an overhaul of the tax system which has ended a dreaded era of irresponsible government.

In 2004, the Warner administration completed the turn around by working with a heavily republican dominated state senate and working a smart tax plan that has created a substantial surplus; over $900 million if I'm not mistaken.

In addition to this, Warner re-tooled the entire workforce in Virginia. Creating one-stop re-careering centers for those who had lost jobs in agricululture and manufacuring, while encouraging a fantastic advances in job creation making Virgina second in the nation.

Virginia is rated #1 by the Government Performance Project. That's right, Warner is head honcho of the #1 best run state in the union.

So it was shocking when the Wall Street Journal Editorial started turning downright nasty:

If all of this sounds a little too good to be true--well, it is. As governor of Virginia, Mr. Warner can best be described as a fairly boilerplate tax-and-spend liberal. Even Democrats in the state agree that his only real "victory" in three-and-a-half years in the state house has been to enact a giant tax increase last year that he plotted to enact over his entire term.


I suppose you have to consider the source; the WSJ Editorial board wouldn't want to see a tax raised if it could save their lives. Still it gets worse:

Gov. Warner alleges that the tax hike was necessary to balance the budget and preserve the state's triple-A bond rating. That was mostly a canard. Months before the tax hike was enacted, the state's revenue office reported a massive 7.5% surge in tax receipts from the previous year due to the national economic recovery. This year, with the higher tax rate, tax receipts have exploded by 12% and the state legislature is swimming in a green river. Just as Gov. Warner's opponents had warned, these extra taxes have not been dedicated to balancing the budget, but to spending on every program imaginable--from schools to mass-transit boondoggles, to day-care subsidies.


Misguided talk like this is enough to make a father cringe. When government balances a budget or creates a surplus, it is government's obligation to use it to protect and serve individuals. Thus, when Warner turned the government around he was able to help families by making day-care subisidies available. The Editors of the Wall Street Journal may think that schools, transportation, and daycare are boondoggles, but to real people that's why we pay taxes. That's what government is supposed to do.

Government is for people, for the real, live people who work and raise families and struggle to survive. Government is for the people who have to take the bus to work, as well the people who have limos and drivers. Government is for the people who have their kids in public schools as well as those who can afford private schools. Government is not just for those who can afford a nanny, government is also for those of us who trust our children to daycare every day.
The Editors of the Wall Street Journal are not satisfied with criticism, they are looking for blame. They want to blame Mark Warner for expanding services provided by the state.

The Virginia state budget has expanded by 26% over Gov. Warner's tenure, about twice the national average for the states. He received a "D" on the Cato Institute Fiscal Report Card of the Governors. "The claim that Mark Warner is a fiscal conservative," complains Peter Ferrara, president of the Virginia Free Enterprise Fund, "is straight out of an Aesop's Fable."


Again, here you have to consider the sources. The Cato Institute and the Virginia Free Enterprise Fund are among the pre-eminent radical right-wing think tanks in America and Virginia respectively. Both of these organizations would have prefered that the President's tax cuts would have been deeper and more geared towards the interests of the very wealthy. It seems that the WSJ Editors couldn't get a more moderate source to criticize Warner's performance.

Even Jerry Kilgore, the Republican who is trying to win Warner's office want to be known as Warner's heir, which he clearly is not. He fought against every reform Mark Warner and Tim Kaine championed. With the help of clear minded Virginians, Tim Kaine will be elected Governor to continue and expand on Mark Warner's great work.

If the Wall Street Journal Editors want to argue that Warner isn't a conservative because he raised taxes and expanded government, then they should feel free to make that argument, misguided and ill-informed as it is. I would argue that he is a fantastic fiscal conservative because his streamlined government is much more financially sound than any of his GOP predecessors.

If, however, the Wall Street Journal Editors want to argue that Mark Warner wasn't a good Governor because he didn't abdicate his responsibility to localities, schools, transporation, and families of Virginina, well I think that says more about the pitfalls of radical conservatism than about any shortcomings as Governor that Mark Warner might have demonstrated.

Mark Warner made all the money he needed to in industry long ago. Rather than sit on his fat bank account complaining about about taxes, as the Editors of the Wall Street Journal seem to prefer, Mark Warner put his brilliance and leadership to work in the service of the people of Virginia. Actions speak louder than words, and the power of Mark Warner's accomplishments will be heard by this nation long after greedy critics are forgotten.

[Crossposted at the Mark Warner for President Blog.]

5 Comments:

At 6/05/2010 10:49:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello im fresh to this, I hit upon this board I have found It amply useful and its helped me out loads. I hope to contribute and assist other people like its helped me.

Thank's, See You Around.

 
At 6/10/2010 02:01:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi i am fresh on here, I came accross this board I find It amply accessible and it has helped me out loads. I should be able to give something back & guide others like its helped me.

Thanks a load, Catch You Later.

 
At 6/13/2010 03:43:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi i'm new to this. I came upon this board I have found It extremely useful & it's helped me out loads. I hope to give something back and aid other users like its helped me.

Cheers, See Ya Later

 
At 6/15/2010 06:49:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello i am fresh to this. I hit upon this website I find It very accessible and it's helped me out alot. I should be able to contribute & help other people like it has helped me.

Thanks a load, Catch You Around.

 
At 6/16/2010 10:36:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi i am fresh to this. I hit upon this site I find It amply useful and it's helped me tons. I should be able to contribute & support others like its helped me.

Thank You, See Ya Later

 

Post a Comment

<< Home